![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Looks like we'll be finding out the canon identity of one of the characters in The End of Time in The Writer's Tale: The Final Chapter. *waits impatiently*
From Blogtor Who: Released next week is The Writer's Tale: The Final Chapter - the "sequel" to last year's excellent book from RUSSELL T DAVIES and BENJAMIN COOK. It's another in-depth discussion of the creative life of Doctor Who covering Russell’s final year as Head Writer and Executive Producer of the show.
The book looks at the period where DAVID TENNANT "wobbled" on his decision to quit and STEVEN MOFFAT came in as show~runner, casting a new actor to play The Doctor. Readers also get to find out about the true identity of "The Woman" in The End Of Time and Martha's proposed parts in Torchwood: Children of Earth and The Sarah Jane Adventures. A full review will be posted next week.
Interesting! Although, I am sort of enamoured of leaving the identity of Claire Bloom's character a mystery.... The Writer's Tale: The Final Chapter will be released on January 14th.
Link to original post (with pics) here: http://blogtorwho.blogspot.com/2010/01/writers-tale-final-chapter-preview.html
EDIT 1/8: Dang. She *was* supposed to be his mum.

From Blogtor Who: Released next week is The Writer's Tale: The Final Chapter - the "sequel" to last year's excellent book from RUSSELL T DAVIES and BENJAMIN COOK. It's another in-depth discussion of the creative life of Doctor Who covering Russell’s final year as Head Writer and Executive Producer of the show.
The book looks at the period where DAVID TENNANT "wobbled" on his decision to quit and STEVEN MOFFAT came in as show~runner, casting a new actor to play The Doctor. Readers also get to find out about the true identity of "The Woman" in The End Of Time and Martha's proposed parts in Torchwood: Children of Earth and The Sarah Jane Adventures. A full review will be posted next week.
Interesting! Although, I am sort of enamoured of leaving the identity of Claire Bloom's character a mystery.... The Writer's Tale: The Final Chapter will be released on January 14th.
Link to original post (with pics) here: http://blogtorwho.blogspot.com/2010/01/writers-tale-final-chapter-preview.html
EDIT 1/8: Dang. She *was* supposed to be his mum.

(no subject)
Date: 2010-01-08 05:12 pm (UTC)Julie Gardner indicated that a lot of people were slotting her as the Doctor's mother, but that seems patently silly to me. More likely Susan, Romana, or even Flavia. Unless her reference to being "lost" meant the period during which she went bad, in which case it could be the Rani.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-01-08 05:27 pm (UTC)And even then - why the weeping angel poses for the femme Time Lords? That's what I'd like to know about, more so than the identity of Claire Bloom's character.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-01-08 05:28 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-01-08 05:44 pm (UTC)I'm pretty sure, if I go back and check the commentary again, that RTD said he was mostly having the faces hidden so a) people didn't go 'hey, it's The Woman!' and b) having the other person hidden gave later writers something to play with if they decided to revisit the situation.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-01-08 06:04 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-01-08 06:12 pm (UTC)The TLs can always go back on someone else's personal timeline. The only reason they wouldn't have been able to is if one of them had been his chaperone at the viewing ritual. And, as you say, the whole 'you can't go back on your personal timeline' may have been more sort of a 'don't cross the streams' Important Safety Tip (thanks, Egon) rather than a literal inability to do so.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-01-08 06:25 pm (UTC)You think you finally have a handle on this stuff, ie Gallifrey resides in a temporal anomaly away from the rest of the universe, allowing Gallifreyans to acquire their unique perspective on time. The Gallifrey Timeline is constant, though - ie Time Lords physically cannot go back on Gallifrey's (and therefore any Gallifreyan's) timeline. Enter the Daleks - they crack the anomaly and synchonize with Gallifrey's timeline, which is the explanation as to how the Doctor keeps meeting them in chronological order. Then in comes RTD and the whole 'Time Lock' idea, and this nice, neat little explanation goes completely out the window.
*grumbles*
(no subject)
Date: 2010-01-08 06:59 pm (UTC)The 'Time Lock' thing seemed to me largely like Krikkit getting dropped into its Slo-Time envelope in H2G2, to be honest - except it wasn't just Gallifrey, but the entire battle arena and all the combatants being shoved into a big fat box away from the rest of the universe.
Given that Karn and Gallifrey were ostensibly in the same solar system, it makes me wonder what the actual canon position would be on its continued existence.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-01-08 07:10 pm (UTC)I dunno - we see Karn for some of Eight's BF audios, is there anything beyond that?
(no subject)
Date: 2010-01-08 09:11 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-01-08 09:13 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-01-08 05:42 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-01-08 05:46 pm (UTC)Of course, saying he's half-human on his mother's side might mean one of his grandparents on his mother's side was human, if we're going to take the line at face value and then be pedantic about grammar.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-01-08 06:05 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-01-08 05:54 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-10 03:32 pm (UTC)(Ye gods, sometimes I hate the "flexible" canon of this show....)
(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-10 08:42 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-01-08 05:27 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-01-08 05:28 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-01-08 05:29 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-01-08 05:36 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-01-08 05:37 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-01-08 05:40 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-01-08 05:45 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-01-08 05:56 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-01-08 06:04 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-01-08 06:05 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-01-08 06:06 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-01-08 06:07 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-01-08 06:15 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-01-08 06:26 pm (UTC)Pardon my ignorance, but what is 'imaging' a computer?
(no subject)
Date: 2010-01-08 06:32 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-01-08 05:50 pm (UTC)The ones for both parts of TEoT are specifically very much different, as RTD notes in the podcasts.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-01-09 07:34 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-01-09 09:17 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-01-08 05:48 pm (UTC)I just hope she's not meant to be Susan, because that would be kinda rude to Carole Ann Ford if they didn't cast her, since she still acts and does Who.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-01-08 06:54 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-01-08 07:08 pm (UTC)